|
|
|
|
|
prong
Experienced Roboteer
Joined: 19 Jun 2004
Posts: 839
|
I think the biggest problem with the rules apart from what exactly they should be is how to know they have been broken and how to enforce them.
In the case where robort was pinning singularity for more than 30 seconds it was actually because all the yoinking around on the drill arm had jammed it, i was trying to release but could not, meaning they were technically just stuck together. Unfortunately this makes ruling hard as i cannot stop to explain to anyone why i have not released singularity (hehe though if you watch the video i can hear me yelling that i was trying to release but couldnt!).
I do not know what we shoudl do in a case like this, perhaps the match should be paused to find out if the rule is being broken, or maybe one of the judges needs to act as a referee, and come and tell me i must release, and i could let them know i cannot etc.
In the case of Basilisk being upsidedown for more than 30 seconds (hehe you can hear me yelling about this on the video too i am not sure if he should be counted as imobile or not. While i do not think there was controlled movement i consider Basilisks blade when upsidown to be a self righting mechanism, and as far as i can see if you are self righting, no matter how long it takes then you are not imobile.
An example would be if a robot had an arm that could extend out the top to push it back over, what if the only motor and gearbox setup with enough power was very slow? say it took 45 seconds just to flip back over? I know if this was my only self righting option then i would prefer it to nothing, but does it count as controlled movement?
Basilisk bouncing around on its spinning bar is a little different, as while it is the self rigther, and eventually it did self right without hitting anyhting else, the self righting is not a known timeframe, it could get back over right away or it could take 2 minutes. I think that after looking at how Basilisk did self right there is a few mods nick could make that would help it self right more easily but the question is does this sort of unknown lenght of time self righter count as imobile?
I see this as being less of a problem if Basilisk can be made to self right more qucikly and predictably, until then we will just have to see how it goes. Also perhaps i would be more in favour of Basilisk being imobile if after being upsidedown for more than 30 seconds he had flipped back and i had lost the match, but as it worked out it just meant lots more fun and carnage for everyone!
Anyway what does everyone think about these issues?
|
Fri Sep 24, 2004 12:03 am |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|