www.robowars.org

RoboWars Australia Forum Index -> Off-Topic

60% emission reduction
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Post new topic   Reply to topic
  Author    Thread
Knightrous
Site Admin


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 8511
Location: NSW


 Reply with quote  

I think we need to upgrade our Kbots to Adv kbots, start building a few fission reactors, maybe a few clocked ones to so we can build them in populated places without people seeing them, maybe build a grogoth for some shits and giggles Razz
_________________
https://www.halfdonethings.com/

Post Sat Dec 08, 2007 7:22 am 
 View user's profile Send private message
Bort
Experienced Roboteer


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 696
Location: Sydney, NSW


 Reply with quote  

Swarms and swarms of peewees Very Happy

Post Sat Dec 08, 2007 10:41 am 
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Valen
Experienced Roboteer


Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 4436
Location: Sydney


 Reply with quote  

bah i'll own j00 allz with my strategic bombers ands spider monkeys.
_________________
Mechanical engineers build weapons, civil engineers build targets

Post Sat Dec 08, 2007 12:11 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number
cerberus3112



Joined: 05 Dec 2005
Posts: 497
Location: Mt Druitt,Sydney,NSW


 Reply with quote  

ninjas for teh winz Laughing
_________________
A journey of a million miles begins with a single step followed by a hell of a lot of other steps so get walking

Post Sat Dec 08, 2007 12:59 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Philip
Experienced Roboteer


Joined: 18 Jun 2004
Posts: 3842
Location: Queensland near Brisbane


 Reply with quote  

quote:
Originally posted by Valen:
Nuclear fusion is the only plausible answer to long term energy demands. Solar thermal might do it with vanadium redox batteries for storage but it wont lead to a "tech level 2" society i don't think.
How long would it take to completely replace all of our fossil fuel needs with nuclear power? What would be the cost of these nuclear stations?

Water could be split into hydrogen and oxygen and used to power a fuel cell in cars. Petrol stations could be modified for this purpose.

I would assume the spent nuclear fuel could go back to the mines when the mine site has finished it's usefulness.

One day a better and cleaner power source will come along to replace nuclear, but until that day, I think that is the only available option.
_________________
So even the rain that falls isn't actually going to fill our dams and our river systems

Post Sat Dec 08, 2007 1:43 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message
Valen
Experienced Roboteer


Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 4436
Location: Sydney


 Reply with quote  

The by product of a fusion reactor is helium.
Which by the way is a non-renewable resource of increasing scarcity.
Nobody as yet has built a fusion reactor, ITER is under construction but they are going to take 50 years to do anything useful with it.
With regards fission Australia has 28 coal fired power stations as far as I'm aware and something like 60% of the worlds uranium.

Hydrogen is an energy transport medium, you don't mine it anywhere and electrolysis of water currently uses assloads more power than is available in the end products.
_________________
Mechanical engineers build weapons, civil engineers build targets

Post Sat Dec 08, 2007 6:30 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number
Philip
Experienced Roboteer


Joined: 18 Jun 2004
Posts: 3842
Location: Queensland near Brisbane


 Reply with quote  

From http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22914283-2,00.html

"However, an exclusive Newspoll survey has found many Australians want the Government to act immediately to phase out coal-fired electricity stations.

Some 86 per cent of Australians want action on emissions within the next three years according to the Newspoll commissioned by Greenpeace.

It found 77 per cent wanted coal-fired power stations phased out by 2010. And 73 per cent wanted coal exports capped or reduced in the same period."

What would people be prepared to pay for this? If this meant the price of energy such as petrol and electricity doubled, would people still want to cut emissions? If industry moved from Australia to other nations where they could still pollute, would Australia want this? If this meant that grocery prices were to double or triple, would people still want this?

Are people prepared to pay for emission reduction?
_________________
So even the rain that falls isn't actually going to fill our dams and our river systems

Post Thu Dec 13, 2007 1:20 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message
cerberus3112



Joined: 05 Dec 2005
Posts: 497
Location: Mt Druitt,Sydney,NSW


 Reply with quote  


quote:
Some 86 per cent of Australians want action on emissions within the next three years according to the Newspoll commissioned by Greenpeace.


who beilives what greenpeace says anyway Razz
_________________
A journey of a million miles begins with a single step followed by a hell of a lot of other steps so get walking

Post Thu Dec 13, 2007 1:40 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
kkeerroo
Experienced Roboteer


Joined: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 1459
Location: Brisbane


 Reply with quote  

So the majority of Australians want to cap or limit our top commodity export? Coal exports are worth around $22 billion dollars last year which means it is equal to 19% of all exports from Australia.
Australia is always made out to be the bad guy of global warming because we are the worlds top producer of coal. This means Australia is the top producer of greenhouse gasses and CO2 emissions according to people like Greenpeace.
While I agree that a solution needs to be found people need to remember the economic impact these changes will have and not just environmental.
_________________
Get Some!!!

Secretary of the Queensland Robotics Sports Club inc.

Post Thu Dec 13, 2007 2:56 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Knightrous
Site Admin


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 8511
Location: NSW


 Reply with quote  


quote:
Are people prepared to pay for emission reduction?


Are people prepared to pay the ultimate price, when it's too late?
_________________
https://www.halfdonethings.com/

Post Thu Dec 13, 2007 3:47 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message
Philip
Experienced Roboteer


Joined: 18 Jun 2004
Posts: 3842
Location: Queensland near Brisbane


 Reply with quote  

quote:
Originally posted by TDT:

quote:
Are people prepared to pay for emission reduction?


Are people prepared to pay the ultimate price, when it's too late?
So would you be prepared to pay any price required to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 25 - 40% of 1990 levels by 2020? Would you count any price too high?
_________________
So even the rain that falls isn't actually going to fill our dams and our river systems

Post Thu Dec 13, 2007 4:00 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message
Knightrous
Site Admin


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 8511
Location: NSW


 Reply with quote  

Like anything you pay for, is it worth the cost? Could you put a price on you grand children's future?

It might suck paying for it now, but hey, it might just be worth it when in 100 years we still have a liveable planet Razz maybe
_________________
https://www.halfdonethings.com/

Post Thu Dec 13, 2007 5:43 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message
seanet1310



Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Posts: 1265
Location: Adelaide


 Reply with quote  

If we cant go outside and food is rearly hard to grow think of how much that will also cost.

Post Thu Dec 13, 2007 5:54 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Knightrous
Site Admin


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 8511
Location: NSW


 Reply with quote  

*Throws grenade*

Let the Stem Cells do it Razz
_________________
https://www.halfdonethings.com/

Post Thu Dec 13, 2007 7:07 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message
Knightrous
Site Admin


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 8511
Location: NSW


 Reply with quote  

I found THIS little article over on THG, thought it might interest a few people, and it's partially relevant to this topic Razz

Looks like they found a nifty way to store hydrogen without compressing it a crapload into a tank.
_________________
https://www.halfdonethings.com/

Post Mon Dec 24, 2007 8:41 am 
 View user's profile Send private message
  Display posts from previous:      

Forum Jump:
Jump to:  

Post new topic   Reply to topic
Page 2 of 5

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Forum Rules:
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 

Last Thread | Next Thread  >
Powered by phpBB: © 2001 phpBB Group
millenniumFalcon Template By Vereor.