|
|
Spockie-Tech
Site Admin
Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 3160
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Theres more to it than just the amps number though Aaron.
The NiCd's will supposedly supply higher peak currents than the NimH's will, but wont do it for as long due to their lower capacity for a given size/weight.
ie. The 2400 Nicd's weigh about 60grams each in a sub-C size and will supposedly supply a reasonably solid 80 amps with peaks over 100..
the 3600 NimH's weigh about the same 60g, but have another 1200mah's of capacity for that same weight. supposedly the trade-off is that they wont supply as high a peak as the nicads will.
So for annihlation, the choice for nicd's or nimh's would be determined on whether you wanted higher peaks or longer duration. the higher peak current would give you a shorter spin up time, but the longer duration cells would give you more spin-ups.
For example, a hammer-bot that requires a sudden burst of high current would appear to be better off with the NiCd's higher current peaks, but a saw-bot with lower, but sustained current draw, the NimH's seem to be better..
Supposedly.
As a matter of fact, I'm starting to get a little suspicious after looking at endless data sheets over the last week or so. They seem to be doing their best to NOT give you any solid comparable data.. some give you the internal impedance at charged state, others at 50% charged, and others at discharged state. some sheets list the discharge curves in terms on minutes, others list it in terms of "capacity" which seems weird to me.
The NiCd's are supposed to have higher discharge rates than the NimH's are, but the data sheets show internal impedances about the same..
I'm beginning to wonder if its all a big marketing con.. especially in the "RC" style cells which are aimed at the hype-heavy radio control car market where pretty "race look" stickers seem to be more important than hard data..
thats why I'm going to buy some of the "boring industrial" CP and N style nicad cells, and some of the "race pretty" RC style RC cells and see if I can get some better data on which one suits our application better.
Anyway, "till I have money" doesnt tell me much about when that might be.. are we talking weeks or months here ? _________________ Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people
|
Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:52 pm |
|
|
|
|
Spockie-Tech
Site Admin
Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 3160
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
I just got some updated prices to include the lower quantities since we have only reached 100 cells on the rc3300hv's that Tim and I want..
Sanyo NimH
...Order Quantity ......<100./..>100./.>500
rc3000h......sub C = ........./........./ $8.25
rc3300hv....sub C = ........./ $7.72 / $6.79
rc3600hv....sub C = $9.62 / $9.32 / $8.20
Sanyo NiCd
...Order Quantity ......<100./..>100./.>500./.>1000
.rc2400.......sub C = ........./ $5.77 / $5.56
cp2400scr...sub C = $5.77 / $4.24 / $4.02 / $3.86
.n3000.cr....Csize = $9.00 / $7.15
cp3600.cr....Csize = $9.48 / $7.52 / $6.59
Gold Peak NimH
...Order Quantity ......<100./..>100
gp3300...............= $9.31 / $8.75
Current Orders
--------------
cp2400scr x 40 (40 for brett)
cp3600cr x 36 (36 for Nick)
rc3300hv x 100 (40 for brett, 60 for tim)
rc3600hv x 60 (60 for Ajax)
-----------------------------
Ajax, you'd save a fair few $ (with only a 10% drop in capacity) if you went for rc3300's in stead of rc3600's since Tim and my order combined already puts us over the 100 cells mark on that model, want to join us in that, or would you prefer to stay with the 3600's at the higher (<100) price ?
Nick, are you sure you want the cp3600's ? They are very expensive for their capacity (because they're Csize rather than the more common sub-C according to the guy at Master Instruments). They are nearly twice the price of the cp2400's..
If you changed to 2xcp2400scr's you would get another 33% capacity (4800mah) for less than the price of the cp3600's, plus using twice the amount of cells in parallel would likely give you higher peak currents than a single set of 3600's would. They would probably be a bit larger, but not too much since the cp2400scr's are sub-C while the 3600's are C.
That also explains the surprisingly high price I got on the N3000Cr's (since they're a C-size), which makes those 2nd-hand K-packs mentioned in the other thread look better value if you dont mind the added size/weight of a C-Size.
Plus, if you changed your 36 x cp3600's to 72x cp2400's, then with my 40, we could get the >100 price on the cp2400's which makes me happy..
I'm ready to order now, Tim says he will be this week (wed or Fri), and I assume you are ? _________________ Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people
|
Mon Sep 13, 2004 11:58 am |
|
|
|
Spockie-Tech
Site Admin
Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 3160
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Master Instruments do have heatshrink.
They measure the width of the shrink when it is folded flat, rather than the diameter (I guess the diameter is hard to measure accurately with the bigger stuff).
The biggest is 163mm width and is $1.65/meter and it gets cheaper as you get smaller.
They said that larger shrink can be had from HeatShrink Australia (www.heatshrink.com.au), but its very expensive from them.
You can get some very strong stuff from builders supply shops, but they dont reccomend it, since it is quite a good insulator and traps the heat from the cells in the pack. Apparently the Army tried it for some heavy duty packs they had Master Instruments make, and they abandoned it after a while, because the packs were getting too hot.
I'm not going to worry about the heatshrink since Gary and I are standardizing on a jiffy box to enclose our cells which makes them easy to mount in the bots, offers protection, and if we need cooling, we can easily add a fan to the box for an intercooled pack. If you would like some, let me know.. _________________ Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people
|
Mon Sep 13, 2004 1:00 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|