|
|
|
|
|
|
Giant Robo
Experienced Roboteer
Joined: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 583
Location: Marayong NSW
|
I`m sorry to hear Ashtons mate was trying to steal your wheels Jake, I gave Ashton the chance to prove he could attend and behave like a respectable human being and he blew it. Again! So he, nor any of his friends will ever be welcome again.
I believed that after the vote was tampered with it was redone legitimately, but now I am not so sure, especialy if those two little SOBs voted as they are not qualified in my opinion either. It may not have changed the result in the end but tampering is something we normally would never suspect.
Apart from those two, I trust every other member/guest. We need to be able to feel comfortable leaving our bits and pieces laying around (achem, I mean neatly arranged within our alloted pit area )
As for voting, I think handing out the balls before the match could prove to be awkward as sometimes I find myself uncertain on which way to vote,(voting criteria, more on that later) so as we have done so far, we call for five people who have definite opinions on who won, they usually, quietly voice their reasons to each other as well.
This way there is no pressure on an individual, making them feel like they`re in a test and must pay 100% attention or else!
With Nick missing on the vote, how about we have 7 balls available;( we usually use 5 don`t we? but 7 magically appeared probably those gremlins again). Or even 9 if they fit but use a minimum of 5 and if someone else (qualified) wants to vote they can, as long as it ends up an unneven number of voters.
|
Fri Dec 10, 2004 12:23 am |
|
|
Giant Robo
Experienced Roboteer
Joined: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 583
Location: Marayong NSW
|
We still need an agreed upon, easy to understand, easy to impliment "judging criteria". A KO is easy, but when it becomes a close match I`m sure the loser would apreciate knowing that we have agreed to consider similar,,, (what is word?) bugger,, help me,, looking at the same things!
What have we got? Style, aggression, damage and er,, the other one? Control?
Style has been debated and a definition not found satisfactorily, becoming flair, pizas or crowd pleasing paintwork. Lets ditch it then. Damage is easy, but does damage alone win over another bot that runs rings around the other one and is still operational at the end?
How do "you" Judge?
|
Fri Dec 10, 2004 1:47 am |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|