www.robowars.org

RoboWars Australia Forum Index -> Off-Topic

Will this plane take off?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Post new topic   Reply to topic

Will the plane take off?
yes
81%
 81%  [ 9 ]
no
18%
 18%  [ 2 ]
Total Votes : 11

  Author    Thread
Knightrous
Site Admin


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 8511
Location: NSW


 Reply with quote  

I wish someone would just go and test the myth Twisted Evil That would solve all the hassles of people arguing about who is theoretically right and blah blah blah....
_________________
https://www.halfdonethings.com/

Post Thu Dec 01, 2005 4:52 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message
prong
Experienced Roboteer


Joined: 19 Jun 2004
Posts: 839


 Reply with quote  

the fun is bringing up little extra things outside the scope of the question!

like the effect the massive moving runway would have on the air above it, and therefor on the plane trying to take off. The runway should generate some headwind, making it easyier for the plane to take off.

Post Thu Dec 01, 2005 4:58 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Nexus
Experienced Roboteer


Joined: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 903


 Reply with quote  

So what would happen if the pilot hit the ejector seat button.
Would he go straight up or would he go up and backwards?
_________________
Bots that do not destroy you, only make you stronger.

Post Thu Dec 01, 2005 5:10 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message
Spockie-Tech
Site Admin


Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 3160
Location: Melbourne, Australia


 Reply with quote  

As someone pointed out, the problem is the question is badly worded.

"Plane speed" and "the plane moves" are too vague, and there are too many unspecified variables.

It depends on whether you are referring to ground speed, relative to a ground-stationary observer, what the wind is doing.

The plane could be doing 100km/hr ground speed, but with a tail-wind high enough to reduce its *airspeed* below its stall point, it wont take off.

It could be doing 20km/hr into the wind and easily take off.

Assuming the wind to be nil, "plane movement" to refer to ground speed. the plane will take off exactly as normal, the only effect will be that the wheels will be doing twice the apparent ground velocity of the plane.

@George. Again. relative to the ground, he would follow a ballistic arc... relative to the plane (ignoring wind drag), he would go straight up.

think of the old analogy of playing ping pong on a train. Its all about frames of reference and velocity vectors.. stuff your average person isnt used to thinking in

Asking vague questions with trick wording sure is good to get everyone thinking.. Smile
_________________
Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people

Post Thu Dec 01, 2005 5:13 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Big AL
Experienced Roboteer


Joined: 16 Oct 2004
Posts: 436
Location: roleystone perth. WA


 Reply with quote  

ok i my opinion (right or wrong) this way might make it take off (this may be what your getting at), picture your rear wheel driven car and a dino putting the rear wheels on the dino and letting it build up speed than hitting the breaks on the dino rollers and watching the car shoot forward at whatever speed they were testing it at the same could be said bout the plane.

let it build up to take off speed then hit breaks on conveyr belt launch the sucker that way Very Happy .
_________________
For West ausies interested in robotics email me at: theoneshrug@hotmail.com
OR
dragoonarie@gmail.com
best quote ever:: "Those Gas-Turbine style warehouse heaters arent illegal, and neither is remote controlling one as far as I know."

Post Fri Dec 02, 2005 8:30 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Valen
Experienced Roboteer


Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 4436
Location: Sydney


 Reply with quote  

yep crappy question wording
australian robot ppls are 100% correct
damn we are just so smart eh
_________________
Mechanical engineers build weapons, civil engineers build targets

Post Fri Dec 02, 2005 9:28 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number
dyrodium
Experienced Roboteer


Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 6476
Location: Sydney


 Reply with quote  

damn straight Laughing
_________________
( •_•)

( •_•)>⌐■-■

(⌐■_■)

YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH

Post Fri Dec 02, 2005 9:31 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
kkeerroo
Experienced Roboteer


Joined: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 1459
Location: Brisbane


 Reply with quote  

No. Wrong.
The car on a dyno would all come down to momentum. An object at rest will tend to stay at rest while an object in motion will tend to stay in motion. So on and so forth.
What you are looking at here is momentum. Momentum = mass * velocity. A car at rest (relative to the ground) spinning its wheels on a dyno will posses only a small amount of momentum in the form of rotational momentum in the wheels (and transmision and bits in the engine). Rotational momentum = moment of inertia * angular velocity. If the brakes are suddenly applied to the dyno the total momentum of the wheels will only bring the speed of the combined mass of the car and wheels up to only a fraction of that at what the dyno was reading.
If you don't believe me read this: http://www.glenbrook.k12.il.us/gbssci/phys/Class/momentum/u4l1a.html
So with the aircraft on a conveyer (if you still beieve that an aircraft is driven through its wheels and not by propellers/jets) the mass of the wheels compared to the total mass of the aircraft is almost insignifcant and the aircraft would bearly move at all if the breakes where suddenly aplied even if you ignore the losses through friction.

Sorry for the spelling but I'am tired.
_________________
Get Some!!!

Secretary of the Queensland Robotics Sports Club inc.

Post Fri Dec 02, 2005 9:42 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Totaly_Recycled
Experienced Roboteer


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 1346


 Reply with quote  

if the brakes did grip and the tires also griped the conveyor then the plane would suddenly be launched back wards as the conveyor is susposed to be going in the opposite direction lol

Post Fri Dec 02, 2005 10:52 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message
Knightrous
Site Admin


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 8511
Location: NSW


 Reply with quote  


quote:
Will this plane take off?


No, because I'm going to steal the motors out of it so it can't Razz
_________________
https://www.halfdonethings.com/

Post Fri Dec 02, 2005 10:58 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message
Big AL
Experienced Roboteer


Joined: 16 Oct 2004
Posts: 436
Location: roleystone perth. WA


 Reply with quote  


quote:
if the brakes did grip and the tires also griped the conveyor then the plane would suddenly be launched back wards as the conveyor is susposed to be going in the opposite direction lol


oh yeah but i was refering to the fact the wheels would still be turning and the convayer belt would stop.

anyone got an ultra light willing to test this out? Cool

as for the car on a dino i remember this seing this one car after after just that had happened.
story goes:
the car was being tested and the dino locked up and the car went sailing racing forward into the wall 20 meters across the room.
mind you this was one of those ricer tune up job with bugger all weight and F$%K loads of horsepower.
_________________
For West ausies interested in robotics email me at: theoneshrug@hotmail.com
OR
dragoonarie@gmail.com
best quote ever:: "Those Gas-Turbine style warehouse heaters arent illegal, and neither is remote controlling one as far as I know."

Post Sat Dec 03, 2005 12:22 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
cerberus3112



Joined: 05 Dec 2005
Posts: 497
Location: Mt Druitt,Sydney,NSW


 Reply with quote  

the plane would take off because i pushed it Razz
_________________
A journey of a million miles begins with a single step followed by a hell of a lot of other steps so get walking

Post Wed Dec 07, 2005 8:38 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Spockie-Tech
Site Admin


Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 3160
Location: Melbourne, Australia


 Reply with quote  

quote:
Originally posted by Big AL:
anyone got an ultra light willing to test this out? Cool


I had one for about 5 years.


I didnt land or take off from any conveyer belts Laughing, but I did do lots of up and on occasion down-wind landings/take-offs and turns and observe ground speeds vs wind speeds etc, so I figure I'm qualified to have an authoritive opinion..
Wink
_________________
Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people

Post Wed Dec 07, 2005 9:24 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Knightrous
Site Admin


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 8511
Location: NSW


 Reply with quote  

Nice modified boat trailer you have there Brett Laughing
_________________
https://www.halfdonethings.com/

Post Wed Dec 07, 2005 9:47 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message
Spockie-Tech
Site Admin


Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 3160
Location: Melbourne, Australia


 Reply with quote  

Actually the trailer I built for it looked more like a boat.

Someone called it a "mobile hangar" once, but it was a PITA to tow with anything less than a land-cruiser..
_________________
Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people

Post Wed Dec 07, 2005 9:52 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
  Display posts from previous:      

Forum Jump:
Jump to:  

Post new topic   Reply to topic
Page 2 of 4

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Forum Rules:
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 

Last Thread | Next Thread  >
Powered by phpBB: © 2001 phpBB Group
millenniumFalcon Template By Vereor.