|
|
|
|
|
DumHed
Experienced Roboteer
Joined: 29 Jun 2004
Posts: 1219
Location: Sydney
|
yeah that's what I'm doing now, but I'll be sending multiple channels over the one link - so it'll end up being fairly similar to a normal old school R/C setup.
edit: I have the transmitter working nicely, giving out a pulse train with the 3 channels and a sync pulse, similar to what normal R/C sets do.
The receiver part is pretty much the same as the normal servo input PWM controller, but it'll also need to decode the channels.
I just had a 2am idea about the serial link system though.
The only real problem with it is that the input function can get stuck, as mentioned, so there's no way of killing the output if the signal is lost.
The solution is of course pretty obvious!
A hardware watchdog (either a watchdog chip, or a basic resistor, capacitor, transistor setup) can look at an output pin giving a pulse on each successful receive, and if anything goes wrong with either the signal, the processor, or the software it'll kill the ouput to the FET driver. _________________
The Engine Whisperer
- fixer of things
|
Fri Feb 03, 2006 3:07 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|