www.robowars.org

RoboWars Australia Forum Index -> Builders Reports

6x7 - NMO - Vic
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Post new topic   Reply to topic
  Author    Thread
dyrodium
Experienced Roboteer


Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 6476
Location: Sydney


 Reply with quote  

Unless... you weld on hardened teeth? Smile
_________________
( •_•)

( •_•)>⌐■-■

(⌐■_■)

YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH

Post Wed Apr 05, 2006 10:44 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
NMO
Experienced Roboteer


Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 486
Location: Melbourne


 Reply with quote  

OK here is a CAD of the proposed robot, I know it looks similar to the retired tnp design however,
The frame is made of box section mild steel 20mm*20mm 2mm wall thickness.
The motors are welded to the frame not bolted in like the existing design,and will be easier to service.
The weapon motor is now internal
The weapon is a spinning disk KE weapon made from either stainless steel or Bisaloy.
Choppingboard armour is being used all around the side walls and polypropoline will be sandwedged between the choppingboard and frame to allow the bot to take some hits.

Weight may very well be an issue with the predicted frame weight of 6.2Kg's I'm still working on that.

http://robowars.org/forum/album_pic.php?pic_id=1227

Post Sun Apr 09, 2006 8:16 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message
Knightrous
Site Admin


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 8511
Location: NSW


 Reply with quote  

Looks purdy Neweyn!
_________________
https://www.halfdonethings.com/

Post Sun Apr 09, 2006 8:33 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message
NMO
Experienced Roboteer


Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 486
Location: Melbourne


 Reply with quote  

I've decided to rename this vapour bot to 6x7 which has a bit more meaning than tnpt. A few of you may know what I'm talking about.

Post Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:49 am 
 View user's profile Send private message
Knightrous
Site Admin


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 8511
Location: NSW


 Reply with quote  

6 x 7 = 42... 42 is the meaning of all life, as we know it Razz
_________________
https://www.halfdonethings.com/

Post Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:04 am 
 View user's profile Send private message
NMO
Experienced Roboteer


Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 486
Location: Melbourne


 Reply with quote  

very good I was wondering how long it would take.

Post Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:06 am 
 View user's profile Send private message
Knightrous
Site Admin


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 8511
Location: NSW


 Reply with quote  

hehehe Cool

I had just come back from my daily visit to ThinkGeek.com and had seen a heap of 42: The Meaning of Life shirts

http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts/feature/desc/0/all
_________________
https://www.halfdonethings.com/

Post Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:14 am 
 View user's profile Send private message
Philip
Experienced Roboteer


Joined: 18 Jun 2004
Posts: 3842
Location: Queensland near Brisbane


 Reply with quote  

When is a door?
_________________
So even the rain that falls isn't actually going to fill our dams and our river systems

Post Wed Apr 19, 2006 5:26 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message
NMO
Experienced Roboteer


Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 486
Location: Melbourne


 Reply with quote  

So I've been playing in cad quiet a bit and have come to a problem.

Do I make a frame out of 20*20*2 mm steel and cover in 6mm chopping board

OR

Do I (similar to kang, Marauder, raiden) build a bot in which the armour is the frame and make it out of 10mm ali.

Both have advantages and disadvantages. What does everyone think???

Post Thu May 04, 2006 11:51 am 
 View user's profile Send private message
Rotwang
Experienced Roboteer


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 1589
Location: Vic


 Reply with quote  

I prefer an inner frame to carry the drives, batterys, electronics etc, some air armour and then the outer shell for protection and in some cases to absorb some of the weapon recoil.

That way a big hit can distort the outer shell without effecting anything vital.

Post Thu May 04, 2006 12:32 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message
Valen
Experienced Roboteer


Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 4436
Location: Sydney


 Reply with quote  

monocouque (or whatever) is lighter for the same strength,
Downside is when somebody hits your armor it can stop your bot from working.

Shell and frame is heavier but armor can break without damaging frame.

It comes down to how much weight you have to play with and how much you wish to devote to "taking hits"

If your weapon isnt "oh my god" i'd probly suggest frame+ armor and better ability to take a pounding.
If on the other hand your weapon is how you win fights, then go monocoque (perhaps with little bits in vunerablle places)
_________________
Mechanical engineers build weapons, civil engineers build targets

Post Thu May 04, 2006 12:41 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number
NMO
Experienced Roboteer


Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 486
Location: Melbourne


 Reply with quote  

there really good points so I'm thinking of 10mm aluminium armour with everything mounted on a frame underneith with some foam cusioning the armour. I've weighed it all out in cad and it should weigh around 11.9 Kg's without the weapon disk

Post Thu May 04, 2006 2:57 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message
NMO
Experienced Roboteer


Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 486
Location: Melbourne


 Reply with quote  

here's a pic of what I'm thinking

http://robowars.org/forum/album_pic.php?pic_id=1238

the squishy foam goes between the steel (grey) and the aluminium white

Post Thu May 04, 2006 3:36 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message
Nick
Experienced Roboteer


Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 11802
Location: Sydney, NSW


 Reply with quote  

From experience, you will have a hard time getting into the weight limit with both a steel frame (even a small one) and 10mm armour - the little bits & pieces just keep adding up. I would look at replacing some of the less critical armour with 5mm or using the 10mm to support the weapon and use less steel, like Kang. Unless the baseplate in that CAD model is really thin, you could reduce the steel to just the weapon support arm.
_________________
Australian 2015 Featherweight champion
UK 2016 Gladiator champion

Post Thu May 04, 2006 4:04 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message
Valen
Experienced Roboteer


Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 4436
Location: Sydney


 Reply with quote  

try to stay away from squares
they are a weak shape
Build stuff out of triangles if possible
_________________
Mechanical engineers build weapons, civil engineers build targets

Post Thu May 04, 2006 11:05 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number
  Display posts from previous:      

Forum Jump:
Jump to:  

Post new topic   Reply to topic
Page 2 of 7

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Forum Rules:
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 

Last Thread | Next Thread  >
Powered by phpBB: © 2001 phpBB Group
millenniumFalcon Template By Vereor.