|
|
dyrodium
Experienced Roboteer
Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 6476
Location: Sydney
|
Geez, all these ESC's seem really touchy... i only want to buy one for most of my future bots... including lightweights... which one?! i'm prepared to pay $420 for the RS80D, but if it blows up, or gets damaged, the repair costs would be really big, but if i got the IBC, i wouldn't be able to run high current motors, and it would most definitly have problems if a motor stalled...
what are my options?
Also, jeff, have you had any problems with your RS80D in singularity? I saw a picture of you actualy riding it, so i'm taking that the ESC is pretty beefy!
Thanks _________________ ( •_•)
( •_•)>⌐■-■
(⌐■_■)
YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
|
Sun Apr 17, 2005 6:55 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spockie-Tech
Site Admin
Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 3160
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Lets not turn this into "Which is better - an RS80 or an IBC ?" Thread. That wasnt my intention when I had my little boast..
The RS80 is a very good controller. Its basically an upscale IBC anyway (OSMC based) with twice the number of fets, the later version (v2) of the uMob controller and current limiting added.
Its also ~$150 more expensive, much bigger and heavier than an IBC, has to come from America, and isnt "open-source", so if you need to fix it locally yourself, forget about getting the circuit diagrams or parts.
Still, if I was building a lightweight or heavier bot with high current motors, I'd quite likely buy one, because (to use a marketing phrase) it is the best controller in its class that I know of.
The IBC just happens to be in a totally different class - it was originally designed to power a hobbyweight (The 6kg "Flying Saucer") and hence was designed to be as small, light and simple as possible , and proved to be just fine for most featherweights as well..
The RS80 was deliberately designed by David Moeller (one of the OSMC developers) to be an IBC-like controller aimed at the light and middle weight robots, so it being bigger and heavier didnt matter, and current limiting was feasible in the price range it was aimed at.
Saying things like "an RS80 powered powered bot would go better than an IBC powered bot" is stupid..
If the IBC is used in the area it is designed for (2WD and some 4WD Featherweights), then in actual fact, all other things being equal, an RS80 powered bot would go *worse*, because more of its weight and size would be used up by the controller, leaving less for other things in the bot like batteries, motors etc.
If you want more powerful motors, 6WD, a bigger or heavier bot, or some other feature that justifies spending the extra cost, weight and size, then the RS80 is definitely the way to go.
But using a bigger controller than you need in a feather weight bot is stupid because you are just wasting weight points and space.
So can we stop with the comparing apples and oranges ? They complement each other in different areas, not compete against each other. _________________ Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people
|
Mon Apr 18, 2005 7:02 pm |
|
|
|
|