|
|
|
Spockie-Tech
Site Admin
Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 3160
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
90% of Car-Audio ratings are wank..
Sorry to be grouchy, but they are.. Its an scene where neon-lit perspex covers and carefully aligned super-oxygen-free-directional-double-overhead-insulation-electron-conductor-matrix's (wire in other words) are more important than anyone actually understanding the difference between RMS and PMPO power ratings.
a *real* 500 RMS watts of audio power would be pain-producing levels inside a car..
In my car, I have 3x 200 watt Response amplifiers (600 Watts RMS Total) driving 2x 12" drivers, 2x 6x9" mid-high's and 2x 6.5" mid-high + tweeters, and the amps are set to about 2/3rds of full power. (yes, there is no back seat). as anyone who has heard it can tell you, even at 2/3rd power its enough to make you want to get out of the car *now*.
If you want to get the best value-for-money with no-bull amps and speakers, believe it or not, Jaycars "Response" range is the most realistically-rated and low-wank-factor gear I know of. Seriously worth a look..
Most of the stuff from Strathfield and JB is aimed more at the rice-burner crowd where show is more important than go.. I mean, Head-Units with "screen-savers".. c'mon guys.. we all drive along watching the pretty patterns on our car-stereo's now dont we ?
Jaycar used to have a thin green book called "UIltimate Car Audio" (or something like that) that had the best low-down on car audio that I've seen. If you can find a copy, its well worth a read.. Real Info without the shiny glitter..
As far as your question on "how loud should it be ?" goes. Well, -> This <- loud..
If you're talking real RMS watts, then 150 should be plenty loud enough.. if you mean "150 watts total Max Power" then it could mean anything from 10-50 of real watts, which mightnt be very loud.
Also the "sensitivity" (efficiency) of your speakers makes a *big* difference in how well those watts get turned into sound pressure levels. pushing lots of watts into a low sensitivity speaker wont produce as much volume as less watts into a higher sensitivity speaker.
Then of course you head over into sound-*quality* land and start to talk about bandwidth, linearity, cross-over freqencies and lots of other juicy stuff that usually gets ignored by those to who having "1.21 Gigawatts" is more important than being able to distinguish a hi-hat from a pair of maraccas.
If you're talking to a car-audio salesman and they cant tell you the continuous RMS watts per channel for your gear, head the other way fast.. _________________ Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people
|
Tue Jun 21, 2005 11:30 pm |
|
|
|
|
DumHed
Experienced Roboteer
Joined: 29 Jun 2004
Posts: 1219
Location: Sydney
|
I have two of the Jaycar Re/Sponse 15" double magnet 300WRMS subs, and some other 12" speakers (in the house, not car!) running off a 750WRMS per channel amp, and I think if I put that in a car it'd literally blow the windows out! It's easily as loud as a rock concert in the house (measured 110db continuously )
I used to run two 12" subs ($30 each 70% off specials from Strathfield) in large boxes from a 2x65WRMS AWA power amp in a previous car, and people could feel the bass from 20m away, but it wasn't insanely loud in the car.
Keep in mind that if you had an amp delivering a real 600WRMS continuously it'd be drawing well over 50A from the car battery!
That doesn't add up too well when you have to run the rest of the car as well from what is probably a 48A alternator
A while back I read some info on PMPO power ratings, and they basically have no relevance whatsoever. They've changed from being an instantaneous peak output power at massive distortion levels, to a theoretical peak output power of the amp's power supply into a dead short - with no actual amp stage involved!!
Car audio ratings used to be simple, where they used "peak" or "music" power, which was generally double the RMS value, and fairly standard accross brands. Once mini "hifi" systems got on the PMPO bandwagon (wow a micro system with 2 megawatts!!!) the car stuff followed, and we have the ridiculous situation you see today...
Originally peak power measurements did have some relevance, because music is generally comprised of peaks, and the way the speakers handle those peaks plays a big part in how they end up sounding.
RMS ratings are usually a continuous maximum power handling of a 1kHz sine wave which, let's face it, doesn't cover much musical content
Generally though, a speaker with a higher RMS rating will handle higher peaks, and be a more powerful speaker in all conditions. _________________
The Engine Whisperer
- fixer of things
Last edited by DumHed on Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:25 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:16 pm |
|
|
|
DumHed
Experienced Roboteer
Joined: 29 Jun 2004
Posts: 1219
Location: Sydney
|
2 x 12" subs will give more cone surface area than one 15" sub, there will be 3db more sensitivity due to there being two speakers, and you may be able to bridge the amp to run them in parallel for more power if it can handle it.
12" speakers also tend to give a "punchier" sound than 15s due to less moving mass, so they respond quicker to musical transients.
One thing to keep in mind though is that if you run the speakers in parallel and the amp in bridge mode you'll lose some of the punchiness due to reduced damping factor (which is the amp's ability to control the cone movement accurately).
Personally I like to run the speakers from individual amp channels, and sometimes even run 8ohm speakers instead of 4ohm, which gives a better damping factor and a "tighter" sound.
You could even run two 12" subs in series, and get about the same output power as one 15" sub, but with a cleaner, punchier sound and more dynamic headroom before distortion.
Just out of interest, two 10" subs gives almost the exact same cone area as one 15" sub _________________
The Engine Whisperer
- fixer of things
Last edited by DumHed on Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:31 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:27 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|