Joined: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 1459
Location: Brisbane
Flame weapons
My brother and me have come up with a new robot that I believe fits into the flame based weapons rules. I will admit that the idea would be extremly technicaly demanding and horribly expensive so it will most likely never be built but it is still an interesting idea. The idea came after talking about a new episode of Mythbusters I downloaded off the net about a Confederate Rocket. Here goes.
The robot will be a traditional wedge shape to get under the other guy and once there a couple of claws/arms/things will clamp him in place. Here is where opinions differ. My idea is to pump liquide hydrogen (fuel) and liquide oxygen (oxidizer) into a combustion chamber under pressure which is then ignited. The two fuels will mix and burn very quickly creating enormous heat and pressure which will be released through an exaust nozzle and into the under side of the opponants robot. My brother thinks a solid fuel like parafin wax and Nitrous Oxide gas as an oxidizer would be safer (because this is what the Mythbusters used).
The end result is that the opponant is held in place while a stream of high pressure superheated gas is jetted into and through his armour in much the same way as a modern anti-tank missile. It all seems to fit into the lattest RFL rules (section 13.6) because no un-burnt liquide or solid fuel leaves the robot, only the exhaust.
So is it within the rules to use the exhaust of the combustion of either gasses, liquides or solids as a weapon?
P.S. Brett, you may want to look at the link to the RFL rules on the main site as it does not work. _________________ Get Some!!!
Secretary of the Queensland Robotics Sports Club inc.
Sat Nov 12, 2005 2:52 pm
Philip Experienced Roboteer
Joined: 18 Jun 2004
Posts: 3842
Location: Queensland near Brisbane
What extra precautions will we need to take for the above weapon, Andrew? _________________ So even the rain that falls isn't actually going to fill our dams and our river systems
Sat Nov 12, 2005 3:15 pm
Nexus Experienced Roboteer
Joined: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 903
Make an amphibious assault vehicle and stay close to a body of water, hopefully theres a pond nearby.
Its probably not legal but would be cool to have a high powered water canon that u can use whatever water is lying around as your water source, adds no weight but dont think its legal unless u can drink it I think. _________________ Bots that do not destroy you, only make you stronger.
Sat Nov 12, 2005 4:33 pm
Daniel Experienced Roboteer
Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 2729
Location: Gold Coast
quote:Originally posted by Philip Taylor:
What extra precautions will we need to take for the above weapon, Andrew?
Ummmmm, 100m minimum exclusion zone around the arena sounds about right.
Fire proof everything in the arena.
Huge fans to remove all the smoke. Or infra red goggles to see through the smoke.
Pray it doesn't get air bourne because it would go through the roof.
Sat Nov 12, 2005 7:59 pm
Philip Experienced Roboteer
Joined: 18 Jun 2004
Posts: 3842
Location: Queensland near Brisbane
quote:Originally posted by Daniel:
Fire proof everything in the arena.
Iron sheeting over the ply? _________________ So even the rain that falls isn't actually going to fill our dams and our river systems
Sat Nov 12, 2005 8:26 pm
Knightrous Site Admin
Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 8511
Location: NSW
I'm guessing the builders of the robot should also supply the required money to upgrade the arena _________________ https://www.halfdonethings.com/
why not ANFO (ammonia nitrate+any combustable liquid) and ignite _________________ WHEN YOU GO TO COURT YOU'RE TRUSTING YOUR FATE TO TWELVE PEOPLE
WHO AREN'T SMART ENOUGH TO GET OUT OF JURY DUTY
Sun Nov 27, 2005 9:51 am
kkeerroo Experienced Roboteer
Joined: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 1459
Location: Brisbane
The rules state that no explosives are to be used. _________________ Get Some!!!
Secretary of the Queensland Robotics Sports Club inc.
Sun Nov 27, 2005 11:39 am
Spockie-Tech Site Admin
Joined: 31 May 2004
Posts: 3160
Location: Melbourne, Australia
ANFO ?
Wilko, youre looking more and more a Troll like all the time with questions like that
Hey, why not some TNT while we're at it ? High Explosive Detonations in a small enclosed space with people standing closeby.. thats a good idea !
Come to think of it, was there anything in the rules about Fusion reactions ?(down Jake..). Perhaps some EMP's.. we can even kill the robots that are still in the pits that way before they even get to the arena ?
Speaking of, what did you say the address of *your* arena was again ? I have a new design I'd like to test out _________________ Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people
Sun Nov 27, 2005 1:00 pm
Glen Experienced Roboteer
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 9481
Location: Where you least expect
wouldnt you be somewhat arrested and jailed for having ammonium nitrate at your place with intent to use it as an explosive lol, cause of the whole terrorism thing.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum